Post Created date
Strange opcodes disassembling .hex (AVR8)
The other day it was found to be disassembling LAT, LAS, and LAC opcode for a mega168, clearly it is FUBAR!
Tuesday, 10 January 2012 - 20:12
How to enter opcodes in inline assembly?
Can you .dw the opcode?
Tuesday, 10 January 2012 - 17:35
How to enter opcodes in inline assembly?
The release notes say something like the brain dead support is "tentative ".
Tuesday, 10 January 2012 - 17:26
How to enter opcodes in inline assembly?
The release notes say something like the brain dead support is "tentative ".
Tuesday, 10 January 2012 - 17:25
How to enter opcodes in inline assembly?
It sounds more like an avr-as bug in binutils. Are you sure the version you are using has full support for the brain dead tinys?
Tuesday, 10 January 2012 - 17:18
Stimuli features?
"beta" being the salient word there ;-) You can either look longingly at your half finished toy or you can use something complete and proven. Your choice.
Tuesday, 10 January 2012 - 17:13
search bootloaderfile "atxmega256a3bu_bootloader_dfu.h
Sounds like it should be in ASF?
Tuesday, 10 January 2012 - 15:33
GPIO reading voltage level
Wonder if OP just needs to be introduced to the weird and wonderful world of pull-ups or pull-downs? Letting things float is never wise and if it's actually driven to 2.2V then...
Tuesday, 10 January 2012 - 15:16
char hello;char hello; no compilation error !!
Try char hello = 'A'; char hello = 'B'; You can define the same variable more than once. It will be put in .comm It's only when different definitions are made that you actually...
Tuesday, 10 January 2012 - 15:07
Additional sections in EEPROM memory
__attribute __((section (". myeeprom"))) --section-start=. myeeprom=0x810124 Puts that at 0x0124 in the EEPROM (as that manual tells you).
Tuesday, 10 January 2012 - 15:01
is there a better way set/clear bit based on boolean
As ?: is syntactically identical to if() else then I'd be kind of surprised if the generated code were ever really different.
Tuesday, 10 January 2012 - 14:55
is there a better way set/clear bit based on boolean
Oh come on Johan, everyone knows that shorter source lines generate less code ;-)
Tuesday, 10 January 2012 - 08:48

Pages