| Discussion Title | Created date |
|---|---|
|
avr-gcc + 64-bit double Hi, in case you want to try 64-bit double support in avr-gcc, here is a pointer to such a toolchain for windos together with instructions how to build such tools from souce: .... |
Tuesday, 17 December 2019 - 09:40 |
|
avr-gcc and avr-g++ are deprecated now. FYI, the avr backend of GCC (avr-gcc, avr-g++) has been deprecated for v10, release schedule spring 2020. If the backend is not re-written to use a different scheme to... |
Thursday, 31 October 2019 - 07:57 |
|
ATtiny3216 user manual? Hi, I cannot find any ATtiny3216 / 17 data sheet. The "Device Documentation" section of https://www.microchip.com/wwwpro... doesn't point to a data sheet, and the other... |
Monday, 22 January 2018 - 11:37 |
|
Datasheet: What is the implied unit of 0x02? Reading the data sheet of [1] of ATtiny417, I am confused about some values without units like "0x02". In particular, "7.2 Interrupt Vector Mapping" on pp. 44 assigns "... |
Monday, 22 May 2017 - 09:57 |
|
avr-gcc Feature: Fixed-Point Support F'up of avr-gcc: New Features? gchapman wrote: More of Embedded C. IIRC, avr-gcc 4.8 will (has) restore(d) fixed point; is that correct? Well, I never saw anybody actually using... |
Wednesday, 23 January 2013 - 23:16 |
|
avr-gcc Features: Atomic operations F'up of avr-gcc: New Features? gchapman wrote: Atomic operations. Most up to all of it can be done with inline assembler. Draft for an atomic OR: #include #include #ifdef... |
Monday, 21 January 2013 - 00:01 |
|
avr-gcc Feature: Better debugging info F'up of avr-gcc: New Features? Levenkay wrote: It would be wonderful if values of variables could be inspected during a debugging session. In my experience, this works less than... |
Sunday, 20 January 2013 - 22:21 |
|
avr-gcc Feature: Inline asm and volatile F'up of avr-gcc: New Features? skeeve wrote: Perhaps a mechanism for marking in-line assembly so that it will not be reordered with respect to volatile accesses. Perhaps by... |
Sunday, 20 January 2013 - 21:46 |
|
avr-gcc Feature: More Warnings F'up of avr-gcc: New Features? ChaunceyGardiner wrote: I would like to see a lot more warnings. We get away with way too much. The simplest example I can think of is int i;... |
Sunday, 20 January 2013 - 21:36 |
|
avr-gcc Feature: Squish up .vectors F'up of avr-gcc: New Features? abcminiuser wrote: Perhaps the ability to squish up the vector table a little - an option to discard any sections of the vector table that aren't... |
Sunday, 20 January 2013 - 21:19 |
|
avr-gcc: New Features? What would be new, reasonable features for avr-gcc¹? Features thatAre useful and will actually be used Don't conflict with the standard ¹ When I write avr-gcc, I mean avr-gcc... |
Sunday, 20 January 2013 - 10:22 |
|
Howto: Support "unsuppported" AVR Devices with avr Hi, from time to time the question comes up, when support for a specific AVR derivative is added to avr-gcc. I wrote some notes on how such device support can be worked out... |
Sunday, 18 November 2012 - 14:26 |