IDE: go to definition of

Log in or register to post comments
Go To Last Post
7 posts / 0 new
Author
Message
stevech
stevech's picture
Level: Raving Lunatic
Joined: Tue. Dec 18, 2001
Posts: 6119 View posts
#1
Posted by stevech: Wed. Jul 22, 2009 - 03:51 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Using other IDEs, I cannot recall/find in Atmel Studio with GCC, the menu choice I use a LOT in other IDEs...

In Editor: click on a variable, constant or function name. Choose "go to where this is defined".

Tags:

Tools, Atmel Studio (AVR-related)
Top
Bronze MarkJohanEkdahl
JohanEkdahl's picture
Level: 10k+ Postman
Joined: Wed. Mar 27, 2002
Posts: 26945 View posts
Location: Lund, Sweden
Posted by JohanEkdahl: Wed. Jul 22, 2009 - 09:10 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

A lot of those neat modern IDE functions, "go to definition", "find all references", "refactor", "class browsing" etc need the IDE as such to parse the source. AFAIK AVR Studio does not do this.

As of January 15, 2018, Site fix-up work has begun! Now do your part and report any bugs or deficiencies here. 

No guarantees, but if we don't report problems they won't get much of  a chance to be fixed! Details/discussions at link given just above.

 

"Some questions have no answers."[C Baird] "There comes a point where the spoon-feeding has to stop and the independent thinking has to start." [C Lawson] "There are always ways to disagree, without being disagreeable."[E Weddington] "Words represent concepts. Use the wrong words, communicate the wrong concept." [J Morin] "Persistence only goes so far if you set yourself up for failure." [Kartman]

Top
Gold Markclawson
clawson's picture
Level: Moderator
Joined: Mon. Jul 18, 2005
Posts: 104937 View posts
Location: (using avr-gcc in) Finchingfield, Essex, England
Posted by clawson: Wed. Jul 22, 2009 - 10:35 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Steve,

For that kind of function download the Microsoft Visual Studio Express 2008 - it offers all that and more and costs the same as Studio and WinAVR

Cliff

Top
Bronze MarkJohanEkdahl
JohanEkdahl's picture
Level: 10k+ Postman
Joined: Wed. Mar 27, 2002
Posts: 26945 View posts
Location: Lund, Sweden
Posted by JohanEkdahl: Wed. Jul 22, 2009 - 11:10 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Or Eclipse + CDT. Or Code::Blocks.

As of January 15, 2018, Site fix-up work has begun! Now do your part and report any bugs or deficiencies here. 

No guarantees, but if we don't report problems they won't get much of  a chance to be fixed! Details/discussions at link given just above.

 

"Some questions have no answers."[C Baird] "There comes a point where the spoon-feeding has to stop and the independent thinking has to start." [C Lawson] "There are always ways to disagree, without being disagreeable."[E Weddington] "Words represent concepts. Use the wrong words, communicate the wrong concept." [J Morin] "Persistence only goes so far if you set yourself up for failure." [Kartman]

Top
haker_fox
haker_fox's picture
Level: Resident
Joined: Sat. Oct 15, 2005
Posts: 586 View posts
Location: Russia, Far East Siberia, Irkutsk
Posted by haker_fox: Thu. Jul 23, 2009 - 02:49 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Unfortunately CodeBlocks' development has stoped more than a year ago. At least under Windows platform. However I have been using it for 3 years. I'm satisfied with it.
Eclipse requires more resourses from PC. Or I'm wrong? It stops me to use it.

Top
Bronze MarkJohanEkdahl
JohanEkdahl's picture
Level: 10k+ Postman
Joined: Wed. Mar 27, 2002
Posts: 26945 View posts
Location: Lund, Sweden
Posted by JohanEkdahl: Thu. Jul 23, 2009 - 10:01 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Quote:

Eclipse requires more resourses from PC. Or I'm wrong? It stops me to use it.

Strenge sequence of sentenses, that. A definitive statement that Eclipse uses more resources. Followed by a definitive doubt that the previous sentence is correct. Topped with a definitive statement that this (doubted) resource consumption is so high thet it stops the poster from using it.

Are this actually opinions, but badly formulated? Or could we get something a bit more "firm" on how it is stopping the poster from using it.

As of January 15, 2018, Site fix-up work has begun! Now do your part and report any bugs or deficiencies here. 

No guarantees, but if we don't report problems they won't get much of  a chance to be fixed! Details/discussions at link given just above.

 

"Some questions have no answers."[C Baird] "There comes a point where the spoon-feeding has to stop and the independent thinking has to start." [C Lawson] "There are always ways to disagree, without being disagreeable."[E Weddington] "Words represent concepts. Use the wrong words, communicate the wrong concept." [J Morin] "Persistence only goes so far if you set yourself up for failure." [Kartman]

Top
Bingo600
Bingo600's picture
Level: Raving Lunatic
Joined: Sun. Apr 25, 2004
Posts: 4099 View posts
Location: Denmark
Posted by Bingo600: Fri. Jul 24, 2009 - 07:32 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

I'm not sure about C::B for windows (I use the 8.02 there) , but for ubuntu i use this one witch updates fine via apt.
http://lgp203.free.fr/spip/spip....
http://lgp203.free.fr/spip/spip....

It doesn't seem like C::B is dead (They just don't release official packages often)

They release nightly builds
http://forums.codeblocks.org/ind...

I have used a nightly build for windows , it worked ok. But it doesn't update (i miss apt for win) , and it was a bit messy to update manually. So i use the "Official there".

http://forums.codeblocks.org/ind...
http://forums.codeblocks.org/ind...

I like that C::B gives me the same environmet on Win & Linux , and that it isn't as heavy as Eclipse.

/Bingo

Top