Using other IDEs, I cannot recall/find in Atmel Studio with GCC, the menu choice I use a LOT in other IDEs...
In Editor: click on a variable, constant or function name. Choose "go to where this is defined".
Using other IDEs, I cannot recall/find in Atmel Studio with GCC, the menu choice I use a LOT in other IDEs...
In Editor: click on a variable, constant or function name. Choose "go to where this is defined".
A lot of those neat modern IDE functions, "go to definition", "find all references", "refactor", "class browsing" etc need the IDE as such to parse the source. AFAIK AVR Studio does not do this.
Steve,
For that kind of function download the Microsoft Visual Studio Express 2008 - it offers all that and more and costs the same as Studio and WinAVR
Cliff
Or Eclipse + CDT. Or Code::Blocks.
Unfortunately CodeBlocks' development has stoped more than a year ago. At least under Windows platform. However I have been using it for 3 years. I'm satisfied with it.
Eclipse requires more resourses from PC. Or I'm wrong? It stops me to use it.
Eclipse requires more resourses from PC. Or I'm wrong? It stops me to use it.
Are this actually opinions, but badly formulated? Or could we get something a bit more "firm" on how it is stopping the poster from using it.
I'm not sure about C::B for windows (I use the 8.02 there) , but for ubuntu i use this one witch updates fine via apt.
http://lgp203.free.fr/spip/spip....
http://lgp203.free.fr/spip/spip....
It doesn't seem like C::B is dead (They just don't release official packages often)
They release nightly builds
http://forums.codeblocks.org/ind...
I have used a nightly build for windows , it worked ok. But it doesn't update (i miss apt for win) , and it was a bit messy to update manually. So i use the "Official there".
http://forums.codeblocks.org/ind...
http://forums.codeblocks.org/ind...
I like that C::B gives me the same environmet on Win & Linux , and that it isn't as heavy as Eclipse.
/Bingo