Atmel-ICE Pin Out

Log in or register to post comments
Go To Last Post
13 posts / 0 new
Author
Message
hobbss
hobbss's picture
Level: Resident
Joined: Wed. Oct 6, 2010
Posts: 987 View posts
Location: Detroit
#1
Posted by hobbss: Tue. Jun 16, 2015 - 02:39 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

I am designing my first board with a 10 pin connector, intending to connect to the Atmel-Ice, and I am paranoid of flipping the the pins, and making the board a pretty paperweight.

 

The schematic below is intended to be on my board, and connect to the ICE.  Does this look correct?

 

 

Ultimately, I'd like to use a Tag-Connect cable rather than put a connector on my board, but came across a disturbing message on their web site regarding the pinout of the Atmel-ICE (http://www.tag-connect.com/TC2030-CTX-NL):

 

WARNING for ATMEL-ICE users: Astoundingly the new Atmel-ICE has it's SWD header pin numbering reversed. To use our cable with their backwards header you'll either need to cut off the ribbon connector locating lug and plug it in reversed, or connect a new ribbon header onto our cable backwards. If you plug in a standard (correct) Cortex cable you're going to short power and stuff out.

 

Per Tag-Connect, they actually sell a cable called TC2050-IDC-050-LEMTA (do you see what they did there? ;) ) that is not in their official catalog to address this issue.

 

Also discussed here: https://www.avrfreaks.net/forum/atmel-ice-debugger (see second to last post).  I just purchased my Atmel-ICE about a month ago.  Has this issue been resolved, or is it still outstanding?

Science is not consensus. Science is numbers.

Tags:

Tools, In-System Debuggers and Programmers
Top
clawson
clawson's picture
Level: Moderator
Joined: Mon. Jul 18, 2005
Posts: 96948 View posts
Location: (using avr-gcc in) Finchingfield, Essex, England
Posted by clawson: Tue. Jun 16, 2015 - 08:58 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Is it me or have you failed to say what CPU you are talking about here? I see the term "SWD" so I assume you are talking about a SAM Cortex ARM rather than some other type of CPU?

 

Anyway the ATmel-ICE manual has pinouts:

 

http://www.atmel.com/webdoc/atme...

http://www.atmel.com/webdoc/atme...

Top
hobbss
hobbss's picture
Level: Resident
Joined: Wed. Oct 6, 2010
Posts: 987 View posts
Location: Detroit
Posted by hobbss: Wed. Jun 17, 2015 - 01:37 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Sorry Cliff -- rookie mistake.  I am in fact trying to connect JTAG to an ATMEGA256RFR2.   I am somewhat confident in my ability to make the connector compatible with the Atmel-ICE stock cable.  I am intrigued by the whole "pin reversed" thing on the connector (i.e., 1 to 10, 2 to 9, etc.)

 

Has anyone here had any experience with that?

Science is not consensus. Science is numbers.

Top
clawson
clawson's picture
Level: Moderator
Joined: Mon. Jul 18, 2005
Posts: 96948 View posts
Location: (using avr-gcc in) Finchingfield, Essex, England
Posted by clawson: Wed. Jun 17, 2015 - 09:13 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

But that reversal is only talking about SWD (that is the debug interface for ARM/Cortex). I think the suggestion is that there's an "unofficial standard" way to wire it on ARM chips and Atmel have chosen a different layout. This has no relevance to ATMega. An ATMega256RF2 uses (Atmel) JTAG or ISP.

Top
Pandurang Chauhan
Pandurang Chauhan's picture
Level: New Member
Joined: Mon. Sep 18, 2017
Posts: 18 View posts
Posted by Pandurang Chauhan: Mon. Oct 23, 2017 - 10:46 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Hi All,

 

I think I had same problem! my board has SAM4LC2A with 10-pin JTAG connector. I connected ICE with JTAG connector with 10-pin connector assuming red wire is PIN-1. I tried for almost 10-11 hrs and finally I saw this post and reversed the connector. It worked!!!

Note: I have basic version of ICE package and hence, I did not have 10-pin connector. So, I manually prepared a connector with 10-pin wire of ICE.

P D Chauhan

Top
Brian Fairchild
Brian Fairchild's picture
Level: Raving Lunatic
Joined: Thu. Oct 18, 2001
Posts: 4253 View posts
Location: Eastern England.
Posted by Brian Fairchild: Mon. Oct 23, 2017 - 11:04 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

It's a fairly common problem when using double-row headers if you want the ribbon cable to play nice.

 

How do you avoid a twist in the ribbon cable in a situation like this...

 

 

 

I've been badly caught out before when designing two boards that needed to be linked by a ribbon and forgetting to swap the pins around on one connector.

#1 This forum helps those that help themselves

#2 All grounds are not created equal

#3 How have you proved that your chip is running at xxMHz?

#4 "If you think you need floating point to solve the problem then you don't understand the problem. If you really do need floating point then you have a problem you do not understand." - Heater's ex-boss

Top
avrcandies
avrcandies's picture
Level: Raving Lunatic
Joined: Wed. Jun 30, 2004
Posts: 3329 View posts
Location: Cincinnati Oh
Posted by avrcandies: Mon. Oct 23, 2017 - 05:42 PM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Also, keep in mind that the physical rows are 1 3 5 7 9   & 2 4 6 8 across from each other.  Occasionally there will be a board where they've physically arranged numbering in a wraparound style (like a dip package).  Then when you make a cable based on the schematic (& assuming to be standard even/odd dual row) &  plug it into the board...nothing...or poof!

When in the dark remember-the future looks brighter than ever.   I look forward to being able to predict the future!

Top
TT_ZX
TT_ZX's picture
Level: Wannabe
Joined: Tue. Jul 11, 2017
Posts: 54 View posts
Location: New Zealand
Posted by TT_ZX: Mon. Oct 23, 2017 - 09:57 PM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

I've used the Tag-Connect cables before.  The no leg (NL) version is a PITA for anything but a quick plug in a program.  You can use a clip on the back to hold the connector on but this won't work if you can't get to the underside of the PCB (like when it's mounted in an enclosure).  The legged version has quite a large footprint so I opted to use a standard surface mount 10 pin 0.05" pitch header instead on my last board.

 

Yes, the Atmel pin numbering is reversed.  This is not something they are likely to change.  It's not a big deal when you know about it but it is annoying.

 

Top
anthony_k
anthony_k's picture
Level: New Member
Joined: Sat. Mar 19, 2011
Posts: 13 View posts
Posted by anthony_k: Tue. Dec 19, 2017 - 01:32 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

 

Annoying is one word to describe it - just got caught by this big time.

 

Either the intern at atmel got the 0.05 10 pin header footprint wrong on the ICE and a special cable was the fix, or they have deliberately reversed it to make sure it only works with their magic and very overpriced cables. Either way, thanks for that...

Top
az10sbum
az10sbum's picture
Level: Rookie
Joined: Fri. Aug 6, 2004
Posts: 37 View posts
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Posted by az10sbum: Sat. Jan 20, 2018 - 06:12 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

anthony_k wrote:

Either the intern at atmel got the 0.05 10 pin header footprint wrong on the ICE and a special cable was the fix, or they have deliberately reversed it to make sure it only works with their magic and very overpriced cables. Either way, thanks for that...

 

Not just the atmel ice -- the jtag-ice3 is the same way.  It is not just an ARM issue.  I was pretty surprised when I found that out.  I buy regular 0.050 ribbon cables and cut the key off of one end.  I put that end in the programmer ( either atmel ice or jtag ice3 ).  The programmed does have a pin one indicator -- it just doesn't line up with the key.  I assume that someone screwed up way back when and they just stuck with it.

 

 

Top
scowell
scowell's picture
Level: Rookie
Joined: Fri. Oct 1, 2010
Posts: 48 View posts
Posted by scowell: Wed. Aug 1, 2018 - 11:28 PM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Using Atmel ICE to multi-program our two-processor board for production.  Switching over from AVR Dragons.  Anyone else notice problems with Dragons?  Been fighting them for a decade, many times asked for help, service rep here (Austin) never let me know they were crap.  ICE fixed it.   I start two .bat files that use atprogram simultaneously to program both chips.

 

Our two JTAGs on our boards are too close together to use the bulky 100mil adapter supplied.  When I bought Mikro-E's 50-100mil adapter (MIKROE-1765) and tried to use it we removed the male 100mil header and put a female on... we had to put it on the back side of the adapter board to make pin1 line up, this allowed us to skip the second 100mil cable.  Still didn't work until I reversed the 50mil cable on the bare (no key) header on the adapter.  I guess we got lucky... moving the header meant I could use the stock uE 50mil cable. 

 

Just spent an hour head-scratching... I have a Cypress Mini-Prog2 that uses this same header style... comparing the 50mil cables... red wire not where I expected it! If I'd used a straight-through 100mil cable out of the adapter I'd *still* be scratching my head.

 

So if you're trying to adapt a ICE to a 100mil JTAG without using the crazy triangle adapter they include (two of them won't fit the board we make at the same time) the Mikro-E adapter will work with the changes we did.  Or you can remove the single pins from the Squid adapter and put them in a dual-5 header... the pins won't fit TE standard though, not without heavy persuasion.

 

 

 

Top
clawson
clawson's picture
Level: Moderator
Joined: Mon. Jul 18, 2005
Posts: 96948 View posts
Location: (using avr-gcc in) Finchingfield, Essex, England
Posted by clawson: Thu. Aug 2, 2018 - 08:23 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

scowell wrote:
Anyone else notice problems with Dragons?
This page has existed almost as long as there have been Dragons with their dodgy PSU design:

 

http://www.aplomb.nl/TechStuff/D...

 

That shows the problems and some workarounds / fixes.

scowell wrote:
(two of them won't fit the board we make at the same time)
Why would you need two? Can't you just daisy chain the JTAGs into a serial chain so either device can be programmed off the one JTAG header?

Top
js
js's picture
Level: Moderator
Joined: Wed. Mar 28, 2001
Posts: 29023 View posts
Location: Sydney, Australia (Gum trees, Koalas and Kangaroos, No Edelweiss)
Posted by js: Sun. Sep 9, 2018 - 08:23 PM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

I have deleted the cross post, you new thread is here https://www.avrfreaks.net/forum/...

John Samperi

Ampertronics Pty. Ltd.

www.ampertronics.com.au

* Electronic Design * Custom Products * Contract Assembly

Top