What does opcode 0xFFFF actually do?

Log in or register to post comments
Go To Last Post
14 posts / 0 new
Author
Message
ErikT
ErikT's picture
Level: Hangaround
Joined: Tue. Apr 24, 2007
Posts: 226 View posts
Location: Birkerød, Denmark
#1
Posted by ErikT: Fri. Aug 31, 2012 - 09:40 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Hi,

I know that opcode 0xFFFF doesn't really exist, but in some cases (rare, thankfully) where a firmware upload through a bootloader has gone wrong, the CPU must eventually stumble upon the 0xFFFF "opcode".

I have checked the datasheets, searched this forum, and googled the topic. But I still haven't found what I'm looking for. (Sorry about that, Bono. Couldn't resist.)

So, I'm asking you guys: Anybody know what an AVR will do when trying to process opcode FFFF? Skip it and read the next, like a NOP? Freeze? Reset?

Best regards,
ErikT

You're absolutely right. This member is stupid. Please help.

Tags:

AVR Microcontrollers, megaAVR and tinyAVR
Top
clawson
clawson's picture
Level: Moderator
Joined: Mon. Jul 18, 2005
Posts: 96505 View posts
Location: (using avr-gcc in) Finchingfield, Essex, England
Posted by clawson: Fri. Aug 31, 2012 - 10:14 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Search for a thread by "Brutte" where this was explored and explained previously.

EDIT: OK it is "sbrs r31,7" so how it behaves depends on what's in bit 7 of R31. It either executes every opcode or every second one.

EDIT2: actually the discovery seems to date back to at least 2004: https://www.avrfreaks.net/index.p...

Last Edited: Fri. Aug 31, 2012 - 10:38 AM
Top
david.prentice
david.prentice's picture
Level: 10k+ Postman
Joined: Sat. Feb 12, 2005
Posts: 29041 View posts
Location: Wormshill, England
Posted by david.prentice: Fri. Aug 31, 2012 - 10:19 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Step through it with JTAG and see for yourself.

No. I have not bothered to.

At a guess, it behaves as a NOP. Most modern CPUs will do nothing for an 'un-implemented' opcode.

In the old days, a 6502 would do 'strange things'.
A 68000 would raise an exception for 'line-F' and 'line-A' opcodes. This could be used to 'expand' the 'features' like a Maths-co-processor.

Untested. Reaching into my distant memory.

David.

Top
clawson
clawson's picture
Level: Moderator
Joined: Mon. Jul 18, 2005
Posts: 96505 View posts
Location: (using avr-gcc in) Finchingfield, Essex, England
Posted by clawson: Fri. Aug 31, 2012 - 10:28 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Quote:

At a guess, it behaves as a NOP

Nope this was the common misconception. It is actually SBRS R31,7. While you might have spotted this with JTAG it would be pretty fortuitous to see that bit 7 of R31 was relevant!

Top
jayjay1974
jayjay1974's picture
Level: Raving Lunatic
Joined: Wed. Oct 30, 2002
Posts: 5770 View posts
Location: The Netherlands
Posted by jayjay1974: Fri. Aug 31, 2012 - 10:37 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Quote:
A 68000 would raise an exception for 'line-F' and 'line-A' opcodes. This could be used to 'expand' the 'features' like a Maths-co-processor.

IIRC the Apple Macintosh used these opcodes as entry points into the OS.

It's funny how the AVR studio 4.16 disassembler does not know about opcode 0xFFFF. SBRS R31,7 seems like a valid instruction.

Top
clawson
clawson's picture
Level: Moderator
Joined: Mon. Jul 18, 2005
Posts: 96505 View posts
Location: (using avr-gcc in) Finchingfield, Essex, England
Posted by clawson: Fri. Aug 31, 2012 - 10:40 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Quote:

SBRS R31,7 seems like a valid instruction.

Well just to confuse things further the current opcode manual says the bit pattern for SBRS is:

1111 111r rrrr 0bbb

So while rrrrr and bbb may be 1's that has a 0 in it.

Top
david.prentice
david.prentice's picture
Level: 10k+ Postman
Joined: Sat. Feb 12, 2005
Posts: 29041 View posts
Location: Wormshill, England
Posted by david.prentice: Fri. Aug 31, 2012 - 10:49 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Officially the SBRS opcode is : 1111 111r rrrr 0bbb

So perhaps bit3 is treated as don't care.

If if does behave as SBRS, then an "empty" mega128 would take 65536 cycles to get back to where it started. i.e. 4.096ms @ 16MHz

The SBRS would either go in 2-word steps @ 2 cycles or 1-word steps @ 1 cycle. i.e. "almost" the same as an even number of NOPs.

So a human is never going to notice whether a bootloader starts directly with BOOTRST, or 4ms 'late' because it skipped throgh an 'empty' application.

David.

Top
ErikT
ErikT's picture
Level: Hangaround
Joined: Tue. Apr 24, 2007
Posts: 226 View posts
Location: Birkerød, Denmark
Posted by ErikT: Fri. Aug 31, 2012 - 10:57 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Quote:
OK it is "sbrs r31,7"

Ooooh. That's weird. Sounds like somebody cut a corner somewhere.

Thanks for your "Brutte" tip. Apparently, the forum search thing doesn't find articles with 0xFFFF, when I search for FFFF. Got it now.

You're absolutely right. This member is stupid. Please help.

Top
clawson
clawson's picture
Level: Moderator
Joined: Mon. Jul 18, 2005
Posts: 96505 View posts
Location: (using avr-gcc in) Finchingfield, Essex, England
Posted by clawson: Fri. Aug 31, 2012 - 11:17 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Just to note that the official NOP opcode is

0000 0000 0000 0000

It would be a simple matter with a utility such as Srecord to have "blank areas" in a .hex padded to hold 0x0000 rather than just rely on the 0xFFFF erased default value in flash if one was really paranoid about such things.

Top
JohanEkdahl
JohanEkdahl's picture
Level: 10k+ Postman
Joined: Wed. Mar 27, 2002
Posts: 26988 View posts
Location: Lund, Sweden
Posted by JohanEkdahl: Fri. Aug 31, 2012 - 12:04 PM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Quote:
Ooooh. That's weird. Sounds like somebody cut a corner somewhere.

In what sense? What do you think should have been done?

As of January 15, 2018, Site fix-up work has begun! Now do your part and report any bugs or deficiencies here. 

No guarantees, but if we don't report problems they won't get much of  a chance to be fixed! Details/discussions at link given just above.

 

"Some questions have no answers."[C Baird] "There comes a point where the spoon-feeding has to stop and the independent thinking has to start." [C Lawson] "There are always ways to disagree, without being disagreeable."[E Weddington] "Words represent concepts. Use the wrong words, communicate the wrong concept." [J Morin] "Persistence only goes so far if you set yourself up for failure." [Kartman]

Top
clawson
clawson's picture
Level: Moderator
Joined: Mon. Jul 18, 2005
Posts: 96505 View posts
Location: (using avr-gcc in) Finchingfield, Essex, England
Posted by clawson: Fri. Aug 31, 2012 - 01:23 PM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

If CPU designers did not skimp on the full opcode decoding the Z80 would never have got the IXH/IXL/IYH/IYL instructions!

http://www.z80.info/z80undoc3.txt

The plan was that the DD/FD prefixes (for example) would just cause an HL opcode to act on IX or IY but it turns out that because of incomplete decode it also affects all the separate H and L opcodes to allowing for IXH/IXL/IYH/IYL operations.

Top
ErikT
ErikT's picture
Level: Hangaround
Joined: Tue. Apr 24, 2007
Posts: 226 View posts
Location: Birkerød, Denmark
Posted by ErikT: Tue. Sep 4, 2012 - 09:53 AM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Quote:
If CPU designers did not skimp on the full opcode decoding the Z80 would never have got the IXH/IXL/IYH/IYL instructions!

Not that I know exactly what that means, but I understand that it has something to do with "accidental", but useful, instructions.

I think it is different with the 0xFFFF in the AVR. You don't get an extra, useful instruction. You rather get a "maybe-NOP", and you may get the microcontroller to reset, if you don't have bootloader code, or something else placed in the higher end of the flash.

Maybe it's just me, but I'd rather have the microcontroller freeze when hitting a 0xFFFF. Better that, than crashing into some data, or into the bootloader.

You're absolutely right. This member is stupid. Please help.

Top
glitch
glitch's picture
Level: Raving Lunatic
Joined: Sat. Jan 12, 2002
Posts: 8696 View posts
Location: Canada
Posted by glitch: Tue. Sep 4, 2012 - 01:05 PM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

It's an unfortunate error in the initial microcode, I wish they would have fixed it in newer AVR's when they changed the documentation. As it stands now, if using a bootloader, it is adviseable to place a NOP right before the bootloader vector table to ensure that the bootloader reset vector is not skipped.

Writing code is like having sex.... make one little mistake, and you're supporting it for life.

Top
Torby
Torby's picture
Level: 10k+ Postman
Joined: Tue. Nov 11, 2003
Posts: 10125 View posts
Location: Bartlesville Oklahoma USA
Posted by Torby: Tue. Sep 4, 2012 - 02:43 PM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

It's not "HCF" (Halt and Catch Fire)?

The largest known prime number: 282589933-1

It's easy to stop breaking the 10th commandment! Break the 8th instead. 

Top