Am I losin' it?

Log in or register to post comments
Go To Last Post
12 posts / 0 new
Author
Message
Howard_Smith
Howard_Smith's picture
Level: Hangaround
Joined: Sat. Nov 9, 2013
Posts: 229 View posts
Location: Dorset, United Kingdom
#1
Posted by Howard_Smith: Fri. Dec 8, 2017 - 03:05 PM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

I've been simulating some stuff on Proteus 7 and have been struggling to get something to work that, as far as I'm concerned, works on paper - a simple H-bridge. The H-bridge itself isn't really the point of interest for me, but it's part of the circuit and it simply doesn't work as I expected it too and for my own life I can't see why not.

This is a screen shot from Proteus, mid-simulation. Now, if I'm going crazy and I'm missing something obvious then great - shout it at me, but why on earth are there the huge voltage drops across Q1 & Q4!? They should be switched on hard should they not?

 

Interestingly I tried swapping out the MOSFETs for BJTs and found the same thing. (note the change in how R7 & R8 are connected and their value)

So in this case, there is a huge voltage drop across Q2 (which is the top right transistor, label's hiding behind R2 unfortunately), but more current is flowing through the motor. If I turn off Q2 & Q3, and turn on Q1 & Q4 however, then the circuit behaves as I expected it too originally with the MOSFETs (note there is no R3 in this case).

So what exactly am I missing here? Am I wrong to think that the H-bridge with MOSFETs will work as expected? I've attached the .dsn files to this post so that anyone else with Proteus can experiment themselves.

Attachment(s): 

Package icon H-Bridge.zip

Tags:

Learning and Information, General Electronics
Top
Brian Fairchild
Brian Fairchild's picture
Level: Raving Lunatic
Joined: Thu. Oct 18, 2001
Posts: 6269 View posts
Location: Eastern England.
Posted by Brian Fairchild: Fri. Dec 8, 2017 - 03:48 PM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Odd. I don't use Proteus so I dropped your circuit into Circuitmaker (the original one) and the top one works just fine. I used 2N2222A for the BJTs and IRF640 and IRF9640 for the FETs.

#1 Hardware Problem? https://www.avrfreaks.net/forum/...

#2 Hardware Problem? Read AVR042.

#3 All grounds are not created equal

#4 Have you proved your chip is running at xxMHz?

#5 "If you think you need floating point to solve the problem then you don't understand the problem. If you really do need floating point then you have a problem you do not understand."

Top
Brian Fairchild
Brian Fairchild's picture
Level: Raving Lunatic
Joined: Thu. Oct 18, 2001
Posts: 6269 View posts
Location: Eastern England.
Posted by Brian Fairchild: Fri. Dec 8, 2017 - 04:07 PM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

#1 Hardware Problem? https://www.avrfreaks.net/forum/...

#2 Hardware Problem? Read AVR042.

#3 All grounds are not created equal

#4 Have you proved your chip is running at xxMHz?

#5 "If you think you need floating point to solve the problem then you don't understand the problem. If you really do need floating point then you have a problem you do not understand."

Top
Howard_Smith
Howard_Smith's picture
Level: Hangaround
Joined: Sat. Nov 9, 2013
Posts: 229 View posts
Location: Dorset, United Kingdom
Posted by Howard_Smith: Fri. Dec 8, 2017 - 04:17 PM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Thanks Brian, I can sleep tonight now ha! Perhaps I should look into using Circuitmaker for simulation from now...

Top
dksmall
dksmall's picture
Level: Raving Lunatic
Joined: Mon. Apr 16, 2001
Posts: 3684 View posts
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posted by dksmall: Fri. Dec 8, 2017 - 04:20 PM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

R1 and R3 make a voltage divider such that when Q5 turns on, the voltage at the gate of Q1 would be 12 volts.  Shouldn't the voltage be something much smaller to turn off Q1?

Top
Brian Fairchild
Brian Fairchild's picture
Level: Raving Lunatic
Joined: Thu. Oct 18, 2001
Posts: 6269 View posts
Location: Eastern England.
Posted by Brian Fairchild: Fri. Dec 8, 2017 - 04:22 PM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Howard_Smith wrote:

Perhaps I should look into using Circuitmaker for simulation from now...

 

It's long been obsolete. It was a Protel product, then bought out by Altium for the PCB side of it and then it disappeared.

#1 Hardware Problem? https://www.avrfreaks.net/forum/...

#2 Hardware Problem? Read AVR042.

#3 All grounds are not created equal

#4 Have you proved your chip is running at xxMHz?

#5 "If you think you need floating point to solve the problem then you don't understand the problem. If you really do need floating point then you have a problem you do not understand."

Top
jgmdesign
jgmdesign's picture
Level: Moderator
Joined: Mon. Mar 19, 2007
Posts: 18672 View posts
Location: Long Island New York
Posted by jgmdesign: Fri. Dec 8, 2017 - 04:24 PM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Proteus makes mistakes? NO!!

Jim

I would rather attempt something great and fail, than attempt nothing and succeed - Fortune Cookie

 

"The critical shortage here is not stuff, but time." - Johan Ekdahl

 

"Step N is required before you can do step N+1!" - ka7ehk

 

"If you want a career with a known path - become an undertaker. Dead people don't sue!" - Kartman

"Why is there a "Highway to Hell" and only a "Stairway to Heaven"? A prediction of the expected traffic load?"  - Lee "theusch"

 

Speak sweetly. It makes your words easier to digest when at a later date you have to eat them ;-)  - Source Unknown

Please Read: Code-of-Conduct

Atmel Studio6.2/AS7, DipTrace, Quartus, MPLAB, RSLogix user

Top
Howard_Smith
Howard_Smith's picture
Level: Hangaround
Joined: Sat. Nov 9, 2013
Posts: 229 View posts
Location: Dorset, United Kingdom
Posted by Howard_Smith: Fri. Dec 8, 2017 - 04:38 PM (Reply to #5)
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

When Q5 is on Q1 shouldn't be off, that is by design.

 

When Q5 is off R1 pulls Q1's gate to +24V. When Q5 is on, yes R1 & R3 form a voltage divider that pulls Q1's gate down to +12V, which is 12V negative with respect to the voltage at Q1's source, thus turning it hard on.

Top
avrcandies
avrcandies's picture
Level: Raving Lunatic
Joined: Wed. Jun 30, 2004
Posts: 9004 View posts
Location: Cincinnati Oh
Posted by avrcandies: Fri. Dec 8, 2017 - 05:53 PM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Why are you simulating this(what do you hope to learn)....it's pretty straightforward, turning some switches on/off.

Add a 1 meg or so resistor to the motor terminal(s) to gnd.  when all fets are off the motor state is floating & undefined.  Add in a resistor  helps to constrain the calculations.

Floating nodes could give the solver a headache.

When in the dark remember-the future looks brighter than ever.   I look forward to being able to predict the future!

Top
N.Winterbottom
N.Winterbottom's picture
Level: Raving Lunatic
Joined: Tue. Oct 1, 2002
Posts: 2805 View posts
Location: Redbourn, Herts, UK
Posted by N.Winterbottom: Fri. Dec 8, 2017 - 07:23 PM
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

Is there a reason R5 & R6 are mismatched ?

Top
Howard_Smith
Howard_Smith's picture
Level: Hangaround
Joined: Sat. Nov 9, 2013
Posts: 229 View posts
Location: Dorset, United Kingdom
Posted by Howard_Smith: Sun. Dec 10, 2017 - 01:57 PM (Reply to #9)
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

As I said in my OP, the H-bridge is not what I was interested in here but still part of the circuit nonetheless, and ultimately was the reason that the part of the circuit that I am interested in wasn't working.

Thanks for the tip with the resistor.

Top
Howard_Smith
Howard_Smith's picture
Level: Hangaround
Joined: Sat. Nov 9, 2013
Posts: 229 View posts
Location: Dorset, United Kingdom
Posted by Howard_Smith: Sun. Dec 10, 2017 - 01:58 PM (Reply to #10)
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Total votes: 0

No I simply forgot to change it's value blush and 10k is the default value.

Top