 |
| Author |
Message |
|
|
 Posted: Sep 25, 2003 - 05:27 AM |
|
Joined: Mar 27, 2002
Posts: 0
|
|
To demangle
c++filt _ZN8SoftUARTC2Eh
SoftUART::SoftUART[not-in-charge](unsigned char)
xc++filt _ZN8SoftUARTC1Eh
SoftUART::SoftUART[in-charge](unsigned char)
Re: C++ ABI: cloning of constructors/destructors
* To: dspezia at amadeus dot net
* Subject: Re: C++ ABI: cloning of constructors/destructors
* From: Nathan Sidwell
* Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 20:52:17 +0100
* CC: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
* Organization: Codesourcery LLC
* References:
dspezia@amadeus.net wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've just installed GCC 3.0 on a i386 linux box.
>
> Having a look at the code generated from a dummy C++
> program, it seems constructors and destructors are
> generated twice even for the simplest classes.
>
> I'm just curious: what is the purpose of this cloning process ?
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#known, from which I quote
G++ emits two copies of constructors and destructors.
In general there are three types of constructors (and destructors).
1.The complete object constructor/destructor.
2.The base object constructor/destructor.
3.The allocating destructor/deallocating destructor.
The first two are different, when virtual base classes are involved. In some cases we can do better, and this is logged in GNATS.
nathan
--
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org
And from: http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/cxx-open.html
Two versions, and two entrypoints, of the constructor will be created: one that calls the virtual base subobject constructor (in-charge), and one that does not. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Maximize
RSS
