| Author |
Message |
|
|
 Posted: Nov 01, 2009 - 07:19 PM |
|
Joined: Apr 25, 2004
Posts: 3809
Location: Denmark
|
|
|
obor00 wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for this useful thread.
I got an error when compiling with ./buildavr-no-insight.sh on my system: the error is due to my version of gcc installed on my PC, version 4.4.1. I got an error with "const char *" instead of "char *" which stopped the compilation.
To solve it, I added a 'sed' instruction to /buildavr-no-insight.sh before the avarice compilation:
Code:
sed -i '98s/jtagDeviceName/(char *)jtagDeviceName/g' ../../source/${avaricebase}/src/jtag2usb.cc
echo "($0) configuring avarice source"
Olivier
In response to this , and this thread http://www.avrfreaks.net/index.php?name ... mp;t=85820
I have made a new buildscript , witch incorporates a patch from Jörg.
Edit: 20-nov-2009 , removed the attached file
See the first post in this thread , for the newest version |
Last edited by Bingo600 on Nov 20, 2009 - 04:32 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Nov 14, 2009 - 09:36 AM |
|
Joined: Mar 12, 2006
Posts: 38
|
|
Hi, I was wondering how this installer script differs from the WinAVR package. I see that the newest "stable" WinAVR release consists of GCC 4.3.2 + avr-libc 1.6.4 + a lot of patches. Bingo's script uses more recent sources but with less patches. Which of these would be the more bug-free package?
WinAVR has a pretty large user base, so I guess their packages get quite a lot of testing. Also, it would be nice (sometimes even compulsory) to get the exactly similar avr hex files from both Windows and Linux development environments.
So, my question is, would it be a good idea to also provide an installer script that installs a package exactly like the WinAVR but for Linux? Or do you think that Bingo's script is in all aspects better, and instead we should use this script also in windows? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Nov 14, 2009 - 08:25 PM |
|
Joined: Apr 25, 2004
Posts: 3809
Location: Denmark
|
|
|
slintone wrote:
Hi, I was wondering how this installer script differs from the WinAVR package. I see that the newest "stable" WinAVR release consists of GCC 4.3.2 + avr-libc 1.6.4 + a lot of patches. Bingo's script uses more recent sources but with less patches. Which of these would be the more bug-free package?
WinAVR has a pretty large user base, so I guess their packages get quite a lot of testing. Also, it would be nice (sometimes even compulsory) to get the exactly similar avr hex files from both Windows and Linux development environments.
So, my question is, would it be a good idea to also provide an installer script that installs a package exactly like the WinAVR but for Linux? Or do you think that Bingo's script is in all aspects better, and instead we should use this script also in windows?
The script & patches i use is based on the FreeBSD repository (Jörg maintains it).
If you want to build a toolchain , that uses WinAVR patches (Eric.W/EW maintains it) , have a look here.
Its the toolchain builder that comes with FemtoOS , made by Ruud Vlaaming.
http://www.avrfreaks.net/index.php?name ... 123#538123
The choice is yours , but to build the toolchain on windows , seems like a waste of time. Since WinAVR is allready made there.
I would expect WinAVR & this script to generate the same code , but sometimes (well most of it ...) WinAVR is a bit ahead of the FreeBSD repository.
/Bingo |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Nov 20, 2009 - 09:28 AM |
|
Joined: Nov 16, 2001
Posts: 411
Location: Grimstad, NO(r)WAY!
|
|
Hi
buildavr-no-insight.sh will not build manily because of a missing file : binutils-patch-avr25-wraparound-reloc.diff
I use zip provided above, namely
build-avr-gcc-4.3.3-libc-1.6.7-insight6.8-arch25-fix.zip
EDIT:
In file get-pathes.sh i saw the note aboute skipping wget for this patch since its a part of atm package. However, I need to research more to understand what that means..
EDIT:
I did a super guess and assumed it refferes to patch-avr25-wrap at the freebsd server. I installed this and renamed it to binutils-patch-avr25-wraparound-reloc.diff and restarted build. That seems to fix the problem. Hope it was the correct patch though, from Joerg...  |
_________________
Regards
Vidar (Z)
"There is nothing new to be discovered in physics now, All that remains is more and more precise measurement." Lord Kelvin
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Nov 20, 2009 - 04:37 PM |
|
Joined: Apr 25, 2004
Posts: 3809
Location: Denmark
|
|
@Zainka
I don't understand the above mail.
The "get-patches.sh" script vould automaticly rename the included patch file to the needed .diff file , when running.
Quote:
# The AVR Architecture 25 Relocaction wraparound patch is included in the package atm , so skip the wget
#wget -c --user-agent=MyBrowser http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~ ... et-unknown
#
# Rename to our patchname
#
mv patch-avr25-wraparound-reloc.patch binutils-patch-avr25-wraparound-reloc.diff
#
The reason i included the patch in the download , was that the FreeBSD repository wasn't updated with the new patch. When i made the buildscript.
I have has several messages about the file in the first post in this thread , building succesfully.
/Bingo |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Nov 20, 2009 - 05:51 PM |
|
Joined: Nov 16, 2001
Posts: 411
Location: Grimstad, NO(r)WAY!
|
|
| Okay.. My fault I unpacked the zip and must have deleted patch-avr25-wraparound-reloc.patch, how I do not know... which it already contained. Sorry for that. |
_________________
Regards
Vidar (Z)
"There is nothing new to be discovered in physics now, All that remains is more and more precise measurement." Lord Kelvin
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Nov 28, 2009 - 02:45 PM |
|
Joined: Nov 28, 2009
Posts: 9
|
|
Please, for the love of all that is holy, at the top of the very first post, in all caps, add the line:
YOU MUST LOG IN TO DOWNLOAD THE SCRIPTS
I banged my head against the wall for half an hour trying to find the gorram scripts everyone kept talking about and couldn't find them anywhere. Only after I gave up and decided to create a forum account to tell you all what nasty horrible evil people you all were did I actually see the download links for the scripts. If you're not logged in you don't see them. It's incredibly frustrating for a noob. Please, save other people from this frustration. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Dec 20, 2009 - 08:12 PM |
|
Joined: Apr 25, 2004
Posts: 3809
Location: Denmark
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Jan 08, 2010 - 10:39 AM |
|
Joined: Apr 25, 2004
Posts: 3809
Location: Denmark
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Jan 16, 2010 - 12:58 PM |
|
Joined: Apr 25, 2004
Posts: 3809
Location: Denmark
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Jan 18, 2010 - 04:27 PM |
|
Joined: Apr 25, 2004
Posts: 3809
Location: Denmark
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Jan 27, 2010 - 06:02 PM |
|
Joined: Apr 25, 2004
Posts: 3809
Location: Denmark
|
|
@26-jan-2010 , updated script & .deb to avrdude 5.10 , all other unmodified.
/Bingo |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Feb 02, 2010 - 06:28 PM |
|
Joined: Aug 17, 2005
Posts: 71
Location: Nuremberg, Germany
|
|
@Bingo600
There is a little bug that does not appear in WinAVr 20100110.
Compiling the demo for Appnote AVR1300 (ATXmega128A1) the generated code for the ISR entry sequence has a bug.
This is only when compiled on Linux by the compiler generated by your last build script. The code generated by WinAVR 20100110 does not have this error.
Listing generated on Linux
Code:
...
ISR(ADCA_CH3_vect)
{
244: 1f 92 push r1
246: 0f 92 push r0
248: 0f b6 in r0, 0x3f ; 63
24a: 0f 92 push r0
24c: 08 b6 in r0, 0x38 ; 56
24e: 0f 92 push r0
250: 18 be out 0x38, r1 ; 56
252: 09 b6 in r0, 0x39 ; 57
254: 0f 92 push r0
256: 19 be out 0x39, r1 ; 57
258: 0b b6 in r0, 0x3b ; 59
25a: 0f 92 push r0
25c: 1b be out 0x3b, r1 ; 59
25e: 11 24 eor r1, r1
260: 0f 93 push r16
...
You see at address 250, 256, and 25c that R1 (__zero_reg__) is used to clear RAMPD, RAMPX, and RAMPZ before it is initialized in 25e.
Listing generated with WinAVR 20100110 does not generate this error.
Code:
...
ISR(ADCA_CH3_vect)
{
244: 1f 92 push r1
246: 0f 92 push r0
248: 0f b6 in r0, 0x3f ; 63
24a: 0f 92 push r0
24c: 08 b6 in r0, 0x38 ; 56
24e: 0f 92 push r0
250: 09 b6 in r0, 0x39 ; 57
252: 0f 92 push r0
254: 0b b6 in r0, 0x3b ; 59
256: 0f 92 push r0
258: 11 24 eor r1, r1
25a: 18 be out 0x38, r1 ; 56
25c: 19 be out 0x39, r1 ; 57
25e: 1b be out 0x3b, r1 ; 59
...
I think there is a patch missing.
Edit: Jörg Wunsch is currently searching for the missing patch. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Feb 04, 2010 - 07:49 AM |
|
Joined: Apr 25, 2004
Posts: 3809
Location: Denmark
|
|
Ok , i'll talk to Jörg
/Bingo |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Feb 04, 2010 - 05:18 PM |
|
Joined: Jul 18, 2005
Posts: 62371
Location: (using avr-gcc in) Finchingfield, Essex, England
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Feb 04, 2010 - 06:34 PM |
|
Joined: Apr 25, 2004
Posts: 3809
Location: Denmark
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Feb 18, 2010 - 09:41 PM |
|
Joined: Apr 02, 2002
Posts: 132
Location: Spokane
|
|
when can we expect the 32u2 support from the last winavr.
I cant get a working avr-libc from this plus the patches from the latest winavr and now have a toolchain that claims but it has the target but the freshly rebuilt libc cant link the crtmxxx files. Jeorge just send the linux folk with this problem to your script. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Feb 20, 2010 - 10:24 AM |
|
Joined: Apr 25, 2004
Posts: 3809
Location: Denmark
|
|
I'm waiting for the WinAVR patches to be migrated over to the FreeBSD repository.
Until that happens , there is nothing i can do.
I haven't got any clue about the timeframe.
/Bingo |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Feb 22, 2010 - 10:36 PM |
|
Joined: Apr 02, 2002
Posts: 132
Location: Spokane
|
|
I started there but the only place the patches seem to be is in the Winavr source directory (which requires access to a windblows machine !#@$@!#$@!!!! )
So ...
Yeah.
Whats up with the normal patch migration?
Are we all just stuck here until atmel puts a nail in the open source and open platform coffin? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Feb 23, 2010 - 11:50 AM |
|
Joined: Apr 25, 2004
Posts: 3809
Location: Denmark
|
|
I'm sure Erik won't mind me posting the patches from the latest Winavr here , they are allready included in the exe package.
Now you can patch your own toolchain.
/Bingo |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Maximize
RSS
